LIVE From the Transforming Local Government Conference – FIVE PBB Communities Showcased!

Perhaps the most inspiring and motivating conference for innovation in local government management has opened it’s doors this morning, and we’re ecstatic to be here on the ground floor!

The Transforming Local Government Conference is the Alliance for Innovation’s annual initiative to showcase the “Bell Labs” of what’s most promising for the future of our communities – the bastions of progress, the upholders of possibility, the high water mark of progress.

FIVE Priority Based Budgeting communities are being showcased this year (click on each to read their “PBB Stories”) ---

City of Fort Collins, Colorado

City of Cincinnati, Ohio

City of Walnut Creek, California

City of Plano, Texas

City of San Jose, California

We are so proud to be associated with the Alliance for Innovation, this conference and their mission. And we are more than humbled to be here as five PBB cities share their stories of innovation, championing the role of local government toward the making of great communities!

Pennsylvania Toasts Priority Based Budgeting Principles

                                             

The Center for Priority Based Budgeting wishes to congratulate the State of Pennsylvania on using priority based budgeting through a most unique lens. Governor Tom Corbett is just a vote and a signature away from passing through new legislation that will fundamentally change the way alcohol is sold in the state.                  

As posted by State Budget Solutions, "As strange as it might seem, this is a perfect example of a state using the principles of priority-based budgeting. The first of four questions that a state must ask itself is "What must the state accomplish?" If a state, like Pennsylvania, has determined that something that once considered a necessary service is no longer a core function of government, than the state is right to do away with it. Many of the PLCB regulation in place today come from the period following Prohibition. Needless to say, the role of government and the nation's attitude towards alcohol have changed."

While the CPBB was not associated with this initiative, all priority based budgeting applications are generally supported. When CPBB co-founders Chris Fabian and Jon Johnson were asked for comment, their only response was "Cheers!"

Walnut Creek Presents This Week at Transforming Local Government Conference - Breakthrough in Communicating the Budget to Citizens with PBB

This week the City of Walnut Creek, California, will present at the Transforming Local Government Conference - their award winning case study was selected by the Alliance for Innovation for it's breakthrough nature in communicating the budget effectively to its citizens.

 Congratulations Walnut Creek!!!

The City is among the earliest-adopters of Priority Based Budgeting, having first implemented the process in 2009. They first presented at the PBB conference last year in San Diego, and will be among the prominent case studies at this year’s Annual PBB Conference in Washington DC.

We wanted to share with you one of the most significant breakthroughs to date in the work – highlighting what the City has done on their own to transform the way they communicate about the budget with their citizens.

So many of us are working so hard to make headway in “authentic citizen

engagement.” It’s not easy! One of our fundamental objectives in creating the “unique lens” of Priority Based Budgeting was and continues to be offering a way to “see” the budget in a way that is so easy, so clear, any citizen, any elected official, any staff member, anybody could understand immediately how decisions are made. Not only that, but we want to make it so clear what decisions and what options are open to us; to provide clarity where it’s sometimes uncertain – that was much of the focus of our September article in Public Management Magazine.

This advancement from Walnut Creek offers such hope and excitement about what’s possible. The City is pioneering in so many ways, not just Priority Based Budgeting, and we encourage you to reach out to them (contact Assistant City Manager / Administrative Services Director, Lorie Tinfow at tinfow@walnut-creek.org).

With the “2012-2014 Budget Story,” we are so pleased to introduce to you yet another innovation from Walnut Creek!

“A Community Connected: The 2012-14 Budget Story,” seeks to share our budget

information in a new way. It identifies what we plan to do over the next two years with the resources placed under our stewardship. It explains the processes we’ve put in place with the community to set the goals that guided our budget decisions. And it tells our story in a way that we hope will be more engaging and easy to follow, using graphics, photos and short stories.”

 - City Manager, Ken Nordhoff, from Page 1: The 2012-2014 Budget Story

Priority Based Budgeting = Strategically Balancing the Books

 

 In the sixth installment of the National League of Cities “State of the Cities 2013” (Strategically Balancing the Books), the findings from their survey have coincided directly with the entire focus of our work. We couldn’t be more pleased with the common chord we appear to be striking!

According to the report:

“The National League of Cities’ 2012 City Fiscal Conditions report  projected a sixth year in a row of declining revenues for cities, and a 25 percent decline in ending balances (reserves) over the last four years. It’s clear that the financial crisis has taken a mighty chomp out of city budgets. But America’s mayors aren’t just standing idle, letting their budgets go by the wayside. They remain remarkably optimistic, innovative, and resilient while making tough choices to balance their budgets.”

From Fort Wayne, Indiana to Henderson, Nevada, mayors are entirely immersed in finding ways to balance the budget, to remain dedicated to the priorities of their community, to weather continued economic uncertainty, and to strive for innovation and not hold tight to the status quo.  How did they do it?

Shifting the Conversation to Policy

Remarkably, NLC’s report highlights strategies that so many of our communities have identified through the “new lens” of Priority Based Budgeting.

Take for example, Douglas County, Nevada who most recently reported on their progress in the "Financial State of the County" presentation. Fresh off the County's recent bond rating upgrade (thanks in part to the implementation of Priority Based Budgeting), the County has also been successful in implementing significant cost saving changes. These Priority Based Budgeting Outcomes To Date include:

• Elimination of Home Occupation Permits
• Elimination of Notary Services
• Reorganization of Finance Department
• Evaluating other department reorganizations
• Review of DMV Services at Lake Tahoe
• Evaluating Utility Billing Improvements

Just as NLC’s communities focused on the “financial policy issues” that drive long-term financial sustainability, so did Douglas County in the context of the Priority Based Budgeting model. They organized this vision around four key policy areas that were particularly insightful to them:

1. Invest in priorities as established by Board and public            
2. Continually improve efficiency and cost-effective services
3. Recover costs within programs
4. Pursue alternative service providers/regional collaboration

Cincinnati, Ohio’s Policy Direction

The City of Cincinnati, Ohio has released their 2013 Recommended Budget, addressing a $34 million deficit through cuts and cost shifting, savings, new revenues, embedded growth, and one-time sources.

The City’s use of Priority Based Budgeting (through their Priority Driven Budgeting initiative) establishes one of the greatest advancements in the use of the process to guide policy direction. The City’s response to Council’s policy direction provides one of the most comprehensive evaluations of city services across the entire organization.

Many organizations have approached us with a strong desire to bring their elected officials into a constructive and transparent discussion about the budget – Cincinnati has set the bar high in this respect. In the most direct way possible, the City used Priority Based Budgeting to guide policy-oriented discussions.  One of the benefits of the process is that it creates specific roles for elected officials to participate and succeed. When elected officials can focus on key policy questions that impact resource allocation, when they’re provided input and transparency in the way their policy questions are answered, and when they can make decisions based on policy impacts, then they’ve played a successful role in budgeting.

(Click here to see the detailed policy direction from City Council, as well as staff’s response, using Priority Driven Budgeting)

In June, the City Council received the results of the Priority-Driven Budgeting initiative and provided this budget policy motion with direction for formulating the 2013/2014 Operating Budget: “That the Administration construct a budget based on the following factors:

Use the information from the Priority-Driven Budget process to:

1.     Recommend elimination or reduction of functions based upon whether other organizations or entities are serving the same populations or providing the same function. If this is the case, the administration should outline a method of transitioning individuals to the other services or programs.

2.     Recommend changes to mandated programs that exceed the minimum requirements of the mandate.

3.     Identify functions that can be shared with other political jurisdictions.

4.     Identify functions that, rather than eliminate them, can be made self sufficient through the establishment of a fee structure.”

The Diagnostic Tool provided data to start discussions about the programs and services we provide to help the City analyze programs and services for cost savings, revenue enhancements and budget reductions. All of the analysis conducted allowed the City to more strategically allocate resources, and provide citizens more transparency, as well as a clearer understanding of the budget decision as we move forward.

While it is the first year Cincinnati has engaged in priority-driven budgeting to this extent, it provides a foundation for examining the services and programs the City provides that are important to the people the City serves.

Click here to see a detailed program listing – the budget status of every City Program in PBB terms: the status of each program in terms of which are increased, decreased, receive no funding change, become reorganized, or are under review.

Thanks again to the work of the National League of Cities, and for giving us inspiration to share the findings in our work that coincide so perfectly with the keys from their research.

CPBB 2013 "Summit of Leading Practices" Annual Conference

 

 

Center for Priority Based Budgeting

2013 Annual Conference

"A Summit of Leading Practices"

July 9 & 10, 2013  Arlington, Virginia   Hilton Crystal City Hotel

 

SAVE THE DATE/REGISTER NOW

 

 

 

 

“Today’s challenges have required local governments to work differently, looking to new and innovative approaches to service delivery, while at the same time reducing costs and increasing efficiency of operation. While “best” practices are always important for managers to follow and implement, it is those “leading” practices—creative and innovative ways to approach service delivery—that hold the greatest promise for us to truly “reinvent” government and the ways we do business…"

Robert O'Neill- Executive Director, International City/County Manager Association (ICMA)  

 

 

The 2013 "Summit of Leading Practices" is the ONLY conference where all  
local government Leading Practices come together under one roof. 

• Fiscal Health

• Priority Based Budgeting

• High Performance Organizations

• Civic Engagement

 

Brought to you by the Center for Priority Based Budgeting (CPBB), International City/County Management Association (ICMA), in partnership with the Alliance for Innovation (AFI).


          

 

Register here for the 2013 Center for Priority Based Budgeting Conference

 

Exhibit space and sponsorship opportunities are available!

 

Contact Erik Fabian at efabian@pbbcenter.org for more information

PBB Explores Role of Local Government in Ensuring Quality Education

In Part #4 of the National League of Cities Report, the focus is on Education as a policy priority, and once again NLC has hit the nail on the head with their perspective. How can local government be a partner in the success of our schools?

In our work implementing Priority Based Budgeting in city and county organizations, a very interesting question tends to emerge: what is the local government’s role in ensuring quality education? In most communities, it is beyond the local government’s sphere of influence to impact education; that’s the role of the school districts. And on the other hand, the success of the school districts has everything to do with the success of the community. What to do?

Fairfield, California

The City of Fairfield is geographically interesting – not far from wine country, neighboring Napa, as well as the City of Vallejo, California. There are few places in the Country who have experienced the type of economic upheaval that this region has gone through, thus the launch of Priority Based Budgeting in the City (see Fairfield PBB article here).

In our work with Fairfield citizens, attempting to define all the influences on the City’s Economic Health Result, something very interesting took place. As citizens and civic leaders spoke of incentive programs to attract new businesses, or services to minimize “red tape” to please existing businesses, another citizen reluctantly spoke up about the role of schools. Families weren’t moving to Fairfield, and in fact some were moving out, in part because of the challenges the school district was having. Incentive programs to attract new businesses sounded fine, but if the company could not be sure that a stable, local workforce would reside to fill jobs, and worse if families were leaving the City, what good would incentives do?

The health and effectiveness of the local education system was at issue, and no amount of businesses incentives could make up for the need to improve the schools. And that’s how Fairfield came to recognize the importance of partnering with schools as an economic issue (as you see in their Result Map, “Promotes Quality Job Creation and Provides a Skilled and Educated Workforce to Fill those Jobs” as a means to achieve a Prosperous Local Economy).

Fort Collins, Colorado

The City of Fort Collins, Colorado was also recently profiled on this blog regarding their unique contribution to the wildly successful business incubator, the Rocky Mountain Innosphere (RMI).

Fundamental to this incredible story is how local government came together with the university to jointly support a business incubator for the creation of new jobs. RMI is not a city program, although the cities of Fort Collins and Loveland are contributors to the partnership. If anything, RMI is the holy grail of the “shared service model” that you hear about from ICMA’s Center for Management Strategies. “The incubator is a private nonprofit corporation. Its operations are funded through private donations and annual contributions from the state government, Colorado State University, local banks, Loveland and the City of Fort Collins.”

The City of Fort Collins, just like every other city and county we’ve helped to implement PBB, also strives to achieve (in their words) “Economic Health.” It’s a priority (just as you can see from their website, here).

But City leaders were brilliant enough to realize that creating a nirvana of job creation need not come in the shape and size of a City program.

Most interestingly, the City’s share of funding to support RMI scored well in the PBB process – it’s was a high priority. However, using the filters of the PBB Model, it was clear that this was a program that others could offer and were offering in the form of business support (in other words, the City need not be the only player in providing this service), that the City wasn’t mandated to do, and was unlikely to pay for itself. Through the lens of PBB, this points precisely in the direction of a partnership. The role of government, even in a high-priority program, is not always to be the direct service provider; it can be a key partner!

Through a Unique Lens: Safe Communities and Public Safety

The National League of Cities latest "State of Cities" report has shed light on a topic that is of such great importance – the policy priority of achieving "safe communities" in our cities.

As we previously detailed on this blog (NLC and PBB Priorities are in Synch), "Public Safety" is one of the most commonly cited priorities in our work, as well as the findings of NLC's research on "State of the City" addresses across the Country. What is most interesting in NLC's latest report is something that we have found in community after community through the implementation of Priority Based Budgeting – the programs that truly help us achieve a "Safe Community" are not only the programs that immediately come to mind…

How We Achieve Safe Community

The Result Map (right) comes from the City of Cincinnati. Precision in Priority Based Budgeting depends on the clear articulation of the cause and effect relationship between a program and a defined Result. With clearly defined “Result Maps,” detailing the factors that influence the Results the organization is in business to achieve, it can seek to minimize subjectivity in the process of linking those Results to programs or services offered to the community.

In Cincinnati's Result Map, you'll see that there are the obvious elements of public safety included in the map (law enforcement, emergency response, crime prevention). Yet, because we strive for a comprehensively defined result in the Result Map, we also see the often over-looked strategies to achieving a Safe Community that are also vitally important in the City (safe environment, feeling of safety for youth and families, safe water and air, ability to travel safely, etc).

A Means to An End: Public Safety as an Economic Health Strategy

Finally, NLC's report also hit on the interplay between Results, and how achieving one Result may be a means to achieving another Result. CPBB is emphatic about the concept of "leverage" in Priority Based Budgeting - a leveraged program being one that has an influence on achieving multiple Results. As we work with communities to align resources with their priorities, our quest is to pinpoint and highlight those programs that produce the greatest investment - one tax dollar spent on a program that achieves multiple Results is a leveraged tax dollar (its as if the money has been spent twice, or three times to achieve two or even three Results!).

It's a tremendously exciting concept, and therefore the CPBB is extremely enthusiastic to see NLC's report highlight the phenomena that sometimes the achievement of one Results is a means to an end to achieve another Result. Take for instance, the City of Billings, Montana, and their policy priority of achieving "Sustainable Economic Development." While this is an economic result, there are elements of public safety all over this Result Map! To the extent that citizens believe that their community is safe, that it is safe to shop and work downtown, it absolutely has an economic impact - Priority Based Budgeting proves this point again and again.

NLC and PBB Priority Community Policy Results in Synch!

NLC (National League of Cities) has recently evaluated "State of the City" addresses from 30 various communities, and from that analysis something very interesting has emerged – among these disparate communities, nearly all identified 5-6 common community policy priorities. 

At the Center for Priority Based Budgeting, we've worked with over 40+ communities to assist them with identifying their own 5-6 top major policies. At CPBB we refer to these priority public policies as "Results."

What is fascinating is that the 5-6 major policy issues identified by NLC are precisely in line with the most commonly articulated "Results" from communities who implemented Priority Based Budgeting (PBB). These include:

• Economic Development
• Public Safety
• Education
• Infrastructure
• Finance 

Resource Alignment with Priorities

It is our quest to understand how dollars are aligned with community priorities, and where we have opportunities to align spending even further. Through the "new lens" of Priority Based Budgeting, we are continuing to find news ways of assessing this alignment - the "Resource Alignment Diagnostic Model" has produced a unique picture, detailing our best choices to reallocate resources when they are less in line with our priorities, to areas of greater return.


What would elected officials, community leaders, administrators and citizens like to see in order to demonstrate that the policy priorities (or "Results) they strive to achieve, are being supported with financial decisions in the budget? We'd love to learn how communities are demonstrating this alignment (and always interested in sharing our approach to this incredible pursuit)
Click here to comment.

City of Edmonton's PBB focus on walkability supported by newly published 10-year study

The City of Edmonton, who are actively implementing Priority Based Budgeting (PBB) by partnering with the Center for Priority Based Budgeting, has identified walkability as one of their community priorities. This community focus is directly supported by a recently published 10-year study by the University of Melbourne.

Lead researcher Professor Billie Giles-Corti, Director of the McCaughey VicHealth Centre for Community Wellbeing at the University of Melbourne, said "The study provided long-term evidence that residents' walking increased with greater availability and diversity of local transport and recreational destinations. The study demonstrates the potential of local infrastructure to support health-enhancing behaviours."

In our work in Priority Based Budgeting, we've seen this once before - in the City of Boulder, Colorado. What’s so unique is the explicit link between the City’s approach to budgeting, and their intended result of a healthier community.

“People here take health and fitness very seriously,” says Steve Mertz, Open Space and Mountain Parks Education and Outreach Coordinator with the City of Boulder. And so does City government.
Just as we’re seeing in Edmonton, the City of Boulder encourages a healthy lifestyle, including enhanced walkability throughout the City through its budgeting process, Priority Based Budgeting.  One of the results against which all 500-plus programs in the City are measured is “A Healthy City and Community.” In other words, the City makes a specific effort to lend support to programs that promote health and fitness within the community.

Congratulations, Edmonton, for your focus on creating a healthier city through improved walkability and urban design!

Center for Priority Based Budgeting

CPBB: "Through the Lens" Update

March 20, 2013

Co-founded in 2010 by:

Chris Fabian & Jon Johnson

The Center for Priority Based Budgeting™ (CPBB), a Denver, Colorado-based non-profit organization established in 2010, provides technical and advisory services to assist local governments, school districts, educational institutions, special districts and other non-profit agencies achieve Fiscal Health and Wellness through Priority Based Budgeting. This creative and unique process, developed by CPBB, enables communities to reassess their priorities in order to make sound, long-term funding decisions. CPBB has already led over 40 communities through this comprehensive body of work. Learn More

Priority-Based Budgeting
How to Engage Citizens and Elected Officials

Is your "new" budget simply a revised version of your "old" budget? Are your strategies for allocating resources or for implementing cost-cutting measures in line with the priorities of the community and its elected officials?

ICMA's Center for Management Strategies presents Priority-Based Budgeting, the first in a series of web conferences designed to share leading practices for managing local governments.

In this session, you will discuss this holistic approach to budgeting that helps local government managers engage citizens in the budget process for a fiscal outcome that aligns with community priorities and gets buy-in from elected officials.

The speakers:
-    Jon Johnson, co-founder, Center for Priority-Based Budgeting
-    Chris Fabian, co-founder, Center for Priority-Based Budgeting
-    Kathie Novak, former elected official and 2009 president of the National League of Cities

To find out more and sign up for this web conference click here

KATHIE NOVAK Joins CPBB as Senior Advisor

The Center for Priority Based Budgeting is thrilled and honored to announce an exciting new partnership with Kathie Novak, a former long-term Council member, former two-term Mayor of the City of Northglenn, Colorado, and former President of the National League of Cities. She joins CPBB Founders Jon Johnson and Chris Fabian in bringing the dynamic and established concepts of Fiscal Health and Priority Based Budgeting to local governments nationwide. Kathie's wealth of experience and insights from the perspective of an elected official will truly enhance and energize the work of the CPBB. Welcome and congratulations Kathie!

Kathie states, "I so believe in what the Center is doing…helping elected officials and communities really understand their financial situation, better communicate that information to their citizens, and use that information to make the best decisions possible for their communities in light of  changing economic situations.    The tools they have developed help policy makers move from the “What we know we need/would like to do”  to the “How do we actually make it happen.”  I wish I had this available when I was in office!"

Visionary and Monterey's PBB Pioneer, Don Rhoads, Heads to the Hills (Beverly Hills, that is)...

From the Monterey County Herald: "City Manager Fred Meurer credited Rhoads with leading the city through the Great Recession and starting a priority-based budget process, which increased fiscal transparency."

Don Rhoads was one of the first true visionaries in Priority Based Budgeting, who knew immediately that the City of Monterey needed to implement the process. Fred Meurer's quote from the Herald is right on target: Don's leadership and vision is directly responsible for the financial sustainability and success of the City of Monterey through the Great Recession. We could not have been more fortunate than to have worked for Don, and his team, in Monterey.

Jon Johnson and Chris Fabian, Co-Founders of the Center for Priority Based Budgeting, offer this review of our work with the City, as we wish Don the best in Beverly Hills: “We have cut millions of dollars out of the City budget over the last two years, and there really isn’t anything left to cut that won’t be painful for our residents and our employees,” said City Manager Fred Meurer. “That is why we have worked diligently this year to get the all of our stakeholders involved in the priority-based budgeting process.”

In 2010, the City of Monterey engaged staff and residents in a priority-based budgeting process to determine how to best address reduced revenues and a five million dollar budget gap. Rather than make across the board cuts, the city brought in The Center for Priority Based Budgeting to help them engage staff and residents in transparently crafting a budget linked to results and values most important to the community. The city hired CPBB because of the proven and refined process for aligning city resources and services with community values that has been implemented successfully in neighboring California communities. Residents were asked to further define broad goals set by the City Council, and then to prioritize how they wanted their tax dollars spent to achieve those goals.

The City of Monterey chose a two-year implementation process.  For the first year, CPBB was engaged to assist the City in reviewing their strategic Results in the form of “value drivers” and then developing definitions of those value drivers and creating “Result Maps”, conducting an orientation workshop for department directors and one for Council.  The project also called for the project team to coach the City as it developed program inventory listings.

Upon completion of this first phase, the City moved on to the next phase where CPBB assisted the City in the completion of the scoring of programs, conducted a Peer Review process, assisted and facilitated a robust Citizen Engagement process and finally developed the program prioritization arrays by score and by cost for utilization in the City’s budget process.

According to “Strong Cities, Strong State,” a California think-tank: “Using a mathematical model developed by consultants with the Center for Priority-based budgeting, the priorities given to specific City programs were considered by executives and the City Council during budget deliberations. The Monterey City Council adopted a balanced 2011-2012 budget and closed a $5 million gap between expenses and revenues with public support and a more informed citizenry."

“The success of the program encouraged the City to continue its commitment to priority-based budgeting. During the current fiscal year, the program focuses internally as departments analyze their programs, staffing and costs. Next year, the City will once again reach out to its citizens for feedback through a comprehensive community survey. Ultimately, the City hopes its new approach to budgeting will monitor the performance of individual programs; help set fees more accurately, and assist in decision-making about where to invest and / or withdraw City resources.”

Congratulations again, Don! CPBB wishes you the best of luck in replicating your success in Beverly Hills.

Douglas County unveils "QUICK WINS" from Implementation of Priority Based Budgeting

On March 11th, Douglas County, NV unveiled their first annual "Financial State of the County" presentation. Fresh off the County's recent bond rating upgrade (thanks in part to the implementation of Priority Based Budgeting), the County has also been successful in implementing significant cost saving changes. These Priority Based Budgeting Outcomes To Date include:

• Elimination of Home Occupation Permits
• Elimination of Notary Services
• Reorganization of Finance Department
• Evaluating other department reorganizations
• Review of DMV Services at Lake Tahoe
• Evaluating Utility Billing Improvements

Additionally, these Outcomes have produced the following Solutions to Financial Stability:

• Reduced and stabilized personnel costs
• Stabilized revenues through shift of existing property taxes from other taxing units
• Implemented regional partnerships, consolidation and privatization
• Shifting property taxes to road maintenance
• Focusing on priorities to ensure highest value to tax payers

Lastly, Douglas County has achieved a breakthrough in Priority Based Budgeting by being able to clearly articulate "what they see" through the "new lens"of the PBB model. They organized this vision around four key policy areas that were particularly insightful to them:

1. Invest in priorities as established by Board and public            
2. Continually improve efficiency and cost-effective services
3. Recover costs within programs
4. Pursue alternative service providers/regional collaboration

Spectacular work Douglas County! Your effective implementation of Priority Based Budgeting is truly paying off to the benefit of the entire community.

Former ICMA Executive Director, Bill Hansell, Leading Lehigh County through Priority Based Budgeting

Lehigh County, PA Moves Towards Priority Based Budgeting

County Executive Bill Hansell, in his "state of the county" address, conveyed that Lehigh County is emerging from the recession in a sound financial condition and that the state of the county is strong.


Looking to the upcoming budget cycle, Hansell specifically cited Priority Based Budgeting, in which a county identifies its larger community values and budgets based on them, in his state of the county address.

Lehigh County Commissioner Vic Mazziotti also said he was particularly pleased with Hansell's movement toward performance evaluations for county employees and priority-based budgeting, two items both Hansell and the commissioners have advocated before.

Congratulations to Lehigh County, County Executive Bill Hansell and the Board of Commissioners for sound fiscal stewardship and taking the initiative to implement Priority Based Budgeting.

More Evidence that Priority Based Budgeting Leads to Strong Bond Ratings

From the Record Courier Douglas County, Nevada has further established the link between Priority Based Budgeting and a community's strong bond rating. Congratulations to Douglas County for this tremendous accomplishment, and for successfully implementing Priority Based Budgeting - an ICMA Leading Practice.

As previously reported at the Davenport Institute for Public Policy, the bond rating agencies, which are critical for a community's ability to borrow funds, are placing an increased focus on local government's ability to provide evidence that resource allocation decisions are tied to community values. The City of Chesapeake, Virginia's breakthrough experience, citing their implementation of Priority Based Budgeting as integral to their ability to demonstrate long-term financial sustainability to the bond rating agencies, was inspiration to our work. Douglas County's efforts continue to substantiate this approach, and we couldn't be more excited about the implications.

Read the full press release here