Governing Magazine recently published the article "Shared Services: Where the Real Potential for Local Government Exists". There is so much truth to this. Whether it comes through partnerships between multiple public agencies (public-public partnerships), partnerships with the private sector (public-private), consolidation, or even (in the right situation) letting one partner take over a service entirely while ensuring that the right outcome is achieved (alternative service delivery, or in/out-sourcing), there are immense opportunities to tap. (We previously wrote on this blog about the incredible small business incubator project Rocky Mountain Innosphere in the City of Fort Collins, CO – very much a public-private partnership).
To Share, or Not to
Share
But where do you look to find these partnership
opportunities? What type of criteria would help you figure out where a
partnership could exist?
Among the success stories you can read about from ICMA and Alliance
for Innovation case studies, you’ll find out about SAFEbuilt and the way they’ve
revolutionized the entire approach to a Building Department through shared
services; or you can turn to CH2MHill and
discover public-private partnerships at their best in terms of running
city/county services. For some services, there are proven successes that can
provide a ready made blue-print for how to implement them in your community.
In our work in Priority Based Budgeting, one of the greatest
outcomes of the work is the ability to shed light on where to find
opportunities for shared services. What if a program was of the highest
priority for your citizens, and you found out you were one of several providers
of this service in your community? Perhaps a partnership would be an incredible
opportunity to produce efficiency in the provision of that program. On the
other hand, what if you found a lower priority program for which there were
other service providers? Maybe the best approach there would be to consolidate
services or even allow the other service provider to take on the program
entirely.
In the City
of Cincinnati, Ohio, City Council identified finding opportunities for
partnership using PBB as a policy priority. In Douglas
County, Nevada, the Board of County Commissioners did the same. In our
story from the City
of Fort Collins, CO, about the Rocky Mountain Innosphere (RMI), the City’s
share of funding to support RMI scored well in the PBB process – it was a
high priority. However, using the filters of the PBB Model, it was clear that
this was a program that others could offer and were offering in the form of
business support (in other words, the City need not be the only player in
providing this service), that the City wasn’t mandated to do, and was unlikely
to pay for itself. Through the lens of PBB, this points precisely in the
direction of a partnership. The role of government, even in a high-priority
program, is not always to be the direct service provider; it can be a key
partner!
Priority Based
Budgeting and Shared Services
Central to PBB is the idea that all local government
organizations can determine the role they're
suited to serve best within a
community, and amongst all potential service providers within a region -
identifying the overlap, the potential for partnerships, consolidated services,
and spinning off of services between city, county, school district, non-profit
and private sector organizations. The end goal is nothing short of the most
efficient use of a community's resources as a whole, to achieve the results of
a region – it’s "bang for the buck" for the provision of public
services.
In Priority Based Budgeting we’re attempting to provide a
comprehensive review of the entire organization, identifying every program
offered, identifying the costs of every program offered, evaluating the
relevance of every program offered on the basis of the community's priorities,
and ultimately guiding elected and appointed officials to the policy questions
they can answer with the information gained from the Priority Based Budgeting
process, such as:
•
What is the local government uniquely
qualified to provide, offering the maximum benefit to citizens for the tax
dollars they pay?
•
What programs are most appropriate to fund
by establishing or increasing user-fees?
•
What programs are most appropriate for
establishing partnerships with other community service providers?
•
What services might the local government
consider "getting out of the business" of providing?
•
Where are there apparent overlaps and
redundancies in a community because several entities are providing similar
services?
•
Where is the local government potentially
competing against private businesses within its own community?
To ultimately see a new way of determining which
services our local government is best suited to provide—services that
have the greatest impact for the resources within the community’s means.
Untapped Potential
According to the State Department, approximately 1.5 million
non-governmental organizations (NGO’s) operate in the United States. There are 87,453
units of local government as recognized by the US Census. Local government no
longer needs to be everything to everybody. We heard Bill Clinton give a speech
recently where he said the single thing he’d love to “do-over” from his
Presidency would be to understand all of the NGO’s and non-profits out there,
what they’re doing, and how government could partner better. It’s more
efficient, there’s less duplication, and we must find the best providers of
services who have the greatest chance of achieving great outcomes. We feel the
same thing about local government. Some of the best things taking place in a
community are coming about from partnerships, where local government is the
leader, the facilitator and often times a key partner, but not always necessarily
the only possible service provider.
The 2013 "Summit of Leading Practices" is the ONLY conference where ICMA's Leading Practices for Local Government Management (and more) come together under one roof.
To learn more about Local Government Partnerships and Priority Based Budgeting from CPBB and the nation's leading local government practitioners, be sure to attend the upcoming...
To learn more about Local Government Partnerships and Priority Based Budgeting from CPBB and the nation's leading local government practitioners, be sure to attend the upcoming...
Center for Priority Based Budgeting 2013 Annual Conference
"A Summit of Leading Practices"
July 9 & 10, 2013 Arlington, Virginia Hilton Crystal City Hotel
REGISTER NOW!
Brought to you by the Center for Priority Based Budgeting (CPBB) and the International City/County Management Association (ICMA), in partnership with the Alliance for Innovation (AFI).
The 2013 CPBB "Summit of Leading Practices" Annual Conference is strongly supported by Quartile 1 sponsor SAFEbuilt and Supporting Sponsor Beehive Industries.
Thank you sponsors!
No comments:
Post a Comment